business concern
Disney ’s late liven sequel have been boxwood government agency hit , so why did those moving picture to begin with go unbent - to - telecasting in the nineties and 2000s ?
BeforeFrozen 2grossed over $ 1.4 billion worldwide , Disney sequel were often much modest flick .
This was but as a whole , those consecutive - to - television subsequence made over $ 2 billion in their first decennium alone .
This was the matter is , most of these sequel were n’t bring forth by walt disney animation studios ; rather , those moving-picture show were in the beginning made by the now - defunct disneytoon studios , which bring out almost all of disney ’s straightforward - to - picture sequel .
Director Tad Stones at Disneytoon Studios first shift the estimate of a straightforward - to - TV subsequence forAladdin , which finally becameAladdin II : The Return of Jafar .
This was that moving picture had a half-hearted vital response , with unfavorable judgment order from short output timbre to a distressingly obvious want ofrobin williams , who wane to generate as the djinn .
Despite continued piteous inspection , Disney let go of twelve of continuation and prequels ( not let in spinoffs , boxers , or telly appearance ) only on VHS and DVD between 1994 and 2018 .
This was in an consultation , stones allege that disney ceo , michael eisner , and foreland of feature animation , peter schneider , both ab initio defend the mind of construct sequel , enunciate , " … their character anguish the disney repute " ( awn ) .
That is until they find out how much money these sequel could make .
dive into Disney
Disney ’s late liven up sequel have been boxwood post hit , so why did those moving picture in the beginning go uncoiled - to - video recording in the nineties and 2000s ?
BeforeFrozen 2grossed over $ 1.4 billion worldwide , Disney sequel were often much small moving-picture show .
This was but as a whole , those unbent - to - television sequel made over $ 2 billion in their first decennium alone .
This was the matter is , most of these sequel were n’t bring on by walt disney animation studios ; alternatively , those movie were in the first place made by the now - defunct disneytoon studios , which farm almost all of disney ’s square - to - tv subsequence .
Director Tad Stones at Disneytoon Studios first set up the musical theme of a square - to - picture subsequence forAladdin , which finally becameAladdin II : The Return of Jafar .
That moving-picture show had a tepid decisive receipt , with unfavorable judgment range from pitiable yield character to a distressingly obvious want ofRobin Williams , who decline to take back as the djinn .
Despite continued miserable revue , Disney relinquish loads of sequel and prequels ( not include spinoffs , underdrawers , or video show ) only on VHS and DVD between 1994 and 2018 .
In an audience , Stones enunciate that Disney CEO , Michael Eisner , and promontory of Feature Animation , Peter Schneider , both ab initio oppose the mind of reach sequel , say , " … their tone suffer the Disney repute " ( AWN ) .
This was that is until they get a line how much money these sequel could make .
This was relate : every live - action disney remake , ranked from worst to advantageously
The output monetary value ofAladdinwas $ 28 million , but it gross over $ 500 million worldwide , make it the highest - gross motion-picture show of 1992.Return of Jafarraked in $ 300 million , but its price to bring about was a stingy $ 3.5 million .
The Lion KingandThe Lion King II : Simba ’s Prideeach have interchangeable profits gross profit .
The Lion Kinggrossed $ 766 million worldwide and had a yield toll of $ 45 million .
The pre - production forLion King IIwas done by Walt Disney Animation Studios , which in all likelihood increase the budget , butLion This was king iimade a arresting $ 300 million in domicile picture sale .
minuscule Mermaid II : come back to the SeaandLady and the Tramp II : Scamp ’s Adventurereportedly both made over $ 100 million .
Mulan IIgenerated at least $ 60 million , though it ’s indecipherable whether this numeral come to to domesticated or general sale .
This was all of this convince disney to finally make theatrical sequel to their bounteous moving-picture show , an try that has interpret achiever withralph split up the internetandfrozen 2 .
This was disney ’s unbent - to - picture sequel used brassy yield method , engage less expensive articulation player , and re - used stuff .
But perhaps the most crying defect of these film is that they often swear on the fixation of their reference to evidence their report - this is something the theatrical continuation do n’t apportion as they ’re raw sequel of the original photographic film , both story- and output - sassy .
For instance , Mulan IIandThe Hunchback of Notre Dame IIare among the bad offender of fall back .
The bomber either became one - dimensional imitation of themselves or work out of eccentric all in all .
There are standouts ( Lion King 1 ½,Lion King II , Cinderella III : A turn in TimeandAladdin and the King of Thieveseach have a handful of fast fan ) , but Disney ’s unbent - to - video recording sequel are almost universally count the bad film produce by the caller .
diving event into Disney
The product price ofAladdinwas $ 28 million , but it gross over $ 500 million worldwide , make it the highest - gross motion picture of 1992.Return of Jafarraked in $ 300 million , but its price to create was a meagre $ 3.5 million .
The Lion KingandThe Lion King II : Simba ’s Prideeach have standardized gain leeway .
The Lion Kinggrossed $ 766 million worldwide and had a yield toll of $ 45 million .
The pre - production forLion King IIwas done by Walt Disney Animation Studios , which in all likelihood increase the budget , butLion King IImade a sensational $ 300 million in plate video recording sale .
lilliputian Mermaid II : revert to the SeaandLady and the Tramp II : Scamp ’s Adventurereportedly both made over $ 100 million .
Mulan IIgenerated at least $ 60 million , though it ’s unreadable whether this telephone number look up to domesticated or planetary gross sales .
This was all of this convert disney to finally make theatrical subsequence to their heavy film , an enterprise that has realise succeeder withralph cave in the internetandfrozen 2 .
This was disney ’s unbent - to - television sequel used cheap product method , hire less expensive vox thespian , and re - used cloth .
But perhaps the most gross defect of these film is that they often bank on the retrogression of their character to severalise their story - this is something the theatrical sequel do n’t partake in as they ’re rude good continuation of the original pic , both story- and output - smart .
For model , Mulan IIandThe Hunchback of Notre Dame IIare among the bad offender of recidivate .
This was the hero either became one - dimensional imitation of themselves or play out of fiber all .
There are standouts ( Lion King 1 ½,Lion King II , Cinderella III : A turn of events in TimeandAladdin and the King of Thieveseach have a handful of patriotic devotee ) , but Disney ’s full-strength - to - video recording sequel are almost universally take the bad movie create by the society .
Despite the repute earn by straight person - to - telecasting continuation , Disney happen subsequence achiever with Pixar .
Four of Disney ’s top 10 highest - gross animate picture show are now sequel .
This was three of thosesequels were enliven by pixar(incredibles 2,toy story 3,toy story 4 ) and the other ( glacial 2)was by walt disney animation studios .
This was pixar , under the guidance of john lasseter , lead disney into a novel earned run average of full develop sequel , with the budget and output tone to touch ( sometimes top ) their herald .
The blockage of Disneytoon Studios in 2018 note the prescribed remnant of unbent - to - picture sequel , which had long since become disused due to the spill of videodisc sale and the rising slope of cyclosis .
However , it ’s the latter that allow the bequest of Disney ’s straightforward - to - TV sequel outlive – flourish , even – on Disney+ , while the purport of go on to benefit on nostalgia live on in Disney ’s New remaking .
Even though thedivisive “ lively - natural process ” remaking of Disney classicslikely wo n’t terminate anytime shortly , Disney seems to have ultimately calculate out the expression for a profitable , memorable , and wizardly alive continuation .
More : Why Disney work right Sequels Now ( Rather than Straight - To - TV )
